![]() ![]() Tools of the Tradeīefore you start using one of the best GPU tests, there are a few useful utilities to install. If you're big into running or you use a GPU accelerated application like LuxCoreRenderer, that's great, but specific optimizations for certain GPU architectures can make a big difference in how your PC runs any specific workload. Finally, GPU compute tests are usually quite different in how they work compared to games. Synthetic tests are typically very easy to run, but they only tell you how your PC handles that specific benchmark - which may or may not equate to real-world gaming performance. Running a game you actually play, or want to play, is usually the best way to test performance. I understand that for many people it's the most that they can afford and that's the end of that.There are three primary types of GPU tests: actual games, 'synthetic' graphics card benchmarks, and compute benchmarks. It's been rough waiting for Pascal, but it'll be worth it.Īll that said, I am happy that you are enjoying your purchase and that nVidia has managed to keep the problems in check, but I stand by the notion that it's a card that you're better off trying to avoid if you can. However, I planned on skipping the 900 series from the get go so I was never in the market for 970. If I were to buy the 970 the memory issue would cause problems for me. The software fix on the 970 is mostly just a bandaid and not a 100% fix. Now while the memory issues on the 970 may not affect many people directly, it leads to problems with performance diagnoses that I'm better off simply eliminating. Now ofcourse I don't like playing at 30 FPS and there-abouts, but it is playable. Granted, I have to keep things mostly at medium, but I can play 4k at 40-50 FPS semi-reliably. I know this because I play at 4k on my GTX 680 with my Philips BDM4065UC. Of course you can't max everything out if you want to play on 4k, but you can play at 4k. And I don't know what's going on with people today, but todays looks AMAZING even at low and medium settings if you tweak them right. I know most people want a shiny new whatever the minute it comes out, but this hardware is useful for many years after it's purchase.Ĭlick to expand.The problem with the "it can't do 4k" argument that I hate is that if you want to play at 4k, you can, just not at max settings. So 6-7 years is a long term investment when it comes to technology. IIRC I had an 8800GT on the 940 for awhile before I bought the GTX470. I've had my i7/680 going on 4 years now and I think I got the 940/470 in late 2009. ![]() When I buy hardware I try to have it for 6-7 years. My secondary rig, currently, is a 940BE, 8gb of ram and a GTX 470. The advantage of having hardware for a long time is that you become familiar with common issues helping to diagnose problems when you're experimenting. I use the secondary mostly to experiment, but it's also used as a second gaming machine when I have a friend over. Whenever I upgrade, my main rig at the time turns into the secondary one. I have my main rig and the secondary one. I have 2 computers, so when I buy something I plan on having it for 6-7 years. Well perhaps "long term investment" was a bad choice of words, but I'll describe what I mean by that. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |